Weyerhaeuser Co.

8 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle
211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 54 times
Subcontracting union work
Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
292 F.2d 317 (7th Cir. 1961) Cited 21 times
Concluding that employer's decision to make changes in operations and abandon part of business was a basic management decision falling outside of NLRA's purview
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adkins Transfer Co.
226 F.2d 324 (6th Cir. 1955) Cited 22 times
No. 12371. October 5, 1955. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Elizabeth W. Weston, Alice Andrews, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Judson Harwood, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Before McALLISTER, MILLER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed a petition for enforcement of its order issued against respondent, Adkins Transfer Company, finding it guilty of violation of Section 8(a) (3)
N.L.R.B. v. Lassing
284 F.2d 781 (6th Cir. 1960) Cited 16 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Lassing, 284 F.2d 781 (C.A.6, 1960), this Court held that an employer may curtail operations, with a resulting loss of employment on certain employees, as long as the changes in operations are not illegally motivated.
N.L.R.B. v. Mahon Company
269 F.2d 44 (6th Cir. 1959) Cited 16 times
In R. C. Mahon the company was in bad financial condition; it had made efforts for two years to curtail expenses, and its two major executives had been critically ill during this period.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Missouri Transit
250 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1957) Cited 15 times
No. 15796. December 27, 1957. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Glenn L. Moller, St. Louis, Mo. (Moller Talent, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and JOHNSEN, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned
N.L.R.B. v. Major
296 F.2d 466 (7th Cir. 1961) Cited 3 times
In NLRB v. Major, 296 F.2d 466 (7th Cir. 1961), the court sustained the Board's finding of a § 8(a)(3) violation where an employer with anti-union animus discharged his drivers and sold his fleet of trucks, but denied enforcement of a resumption order, finding that the employer's anti-union feelings did not cause the occurrence of the discharges, which would have occurred for legitimate reasons in any event, but only caused the discharges to occur earlier than they otherwise would have.
Williams Motor Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
128 F.2d 960 (8th Cir. 1942) Cited 15 times
In Williams Motor Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 128 F.2d 960, under its contract the dealer was compelled to make arrangements for selling and servicing cars throughout an interstate territory covering parts of three states.

Weyerhaeuser Co.

8 Cited authorities

Subcontracting union work

Concluding that employer's decision to make changes in operations and abandon part of business was a basic management decision falling outside of NLRA's purview

In National Labor Relations Board v. Lassing, 284 F.2d 781 (C.A.6, 1960), this Court held that an employer may curtail operations, with a resulting loss of employment on certain employees, as long as the changes in operations are not illegally motivated.

In R. C. Mahon the company was in bad financial condition; it had made efforts for two years to curtail expenses, and its two major executives had been critically ill during this period.

In Williams Motor Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 128 F.2d 960, under its contract the dealer was compelled to make arrangements for selling and servicing cars throughout an interstate territory covering parts of three states.