§

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

113 N.L.R.B. 954 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Westinghouse Electric Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.

    336 U.S. 226 (1949)   Cited 46 times
    In NLRB v. Stowe Spinning Co., 336 U.S. 226, 232-33, 69 S.Ct. 541, 544, 93 L.Ed. 638 (1949), the Court declined to enforce an order requiring an employer to make its meeting hall available to a union; the Board might legitimately bar discrimination against unions, the Court said, but could not require the employer to prefer unions over other potential users.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 34 times

    No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,

  4. National Labor Bd. v. Lake Superior Lumber

    167 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 36 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Lake Superior Lumber Corp., 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 147, 151, this court, in considering a similar contention, referred to the language of the Supreme Court in Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 66 S.Ct. 276, 90 L.Ed. 265, to the following effect: "`We do not agree that the corporation's property interests settle the question.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Leland-Gifford Co.

    200 F.2d 620 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 4654. December 22, 1952. Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associated Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Ernest L. Anderson, Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit Judge. The principal issue presented by this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Otis Elevator Co.

    208 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 28, Docket 22727. Argued October 6, 1953. Decided November 10, 1953. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Fayette S. Dunn, New York City, and Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C. (Denham Humphrey, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Roscoe Skipper

    213 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14885. June 18, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott. General Counsel, Owsley Vose, John C. Rohrbaugh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Kontz Bennett, Waycross, Ga. (Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. This small tempest

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Boston Herald-Traveler

    210 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 1 times

    No. 4781. January 28, 1954. Robert E. Greene, Chief Law Officer, First Region, Boston, Mass. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Peter Bauer, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for petitioner. Frank W. Crocker, Boston, Mass. (Ropes, Gray, Best, Coolidge Rugg, Boston, Mass., with him on brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.. v. Cities Service Oil

    122 F.2d 149 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 11 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Cities Service Oil Co., 2 Cir., 122 F.2d 149, we held that a shipowner must give passes to union representatives to board ships in order to learn what grievances, if any, the crew might have, that being the only effective way open to secure redress.

  10. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    143 F.2d 860 (9th Cir. 1944)   Cited 4 times

    No. 10437. June 30, 1944. Concurring Opinion July 19, 1944. Upon Petition for Review and for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings on petition by Richfield Oil Corporation against National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of respondent wherein respondent petitioned for enforcement of order. Order enforced in accordance with opinion. David Guntert, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, William