Westinghouse Electric Corp.

14 Cited authorities

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 311 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.
472 F.2d 1307 (D.C. Cir. 1972) Cited 97 times
Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"
San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 50 times
Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.
763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985) Cited 31 times
Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production
N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors
633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 33 times
No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 times
Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company
360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 51 times
Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award
Kawasaki Motors Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. N.L.R.B
850 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 19 times
Stating that discriminatee need only seek employment "substantially equivalent to" former job and is not required to "seek or retain a job more onerous than the job from which he or she was discharged"
N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service
888 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1989) Cited 14 times
Holding that an employer violates the NLRA when it fails “to provide information that is needed by the bargaining representative for the proper performance of its duties”

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"

Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

Stating that discriminatee need only seek employment "substantially equivalent to" former job and is not required to "seek or retain a job more onerous than the job from which he or she was discharged"

Holding that an employer violates the NLRA when it fails “to provide information that is needed by the bargaining representative for the proper performance of its duties”