Westinghouse Electric Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of ยง 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Townsend and Bottum, Inc.

    722 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 1 times

    No. 82-1055. Argued June 14, 1983. Decided December 2, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Paul Spielberg, argued, for petitioner. Bruce W. Martin, Craig A. Miller, Miller, Johnson, Snell Cummiske, Kalamazoo, Mich., Barry Smith, argued, Paul A. Williams, Reamon, Williams, Klukowski, Wood Drew, Grand Rapids, Mich., for respondent. Steven C. Kahn, Pepper, Hamilton Scheetz, Washington, D.C., for amicus