§

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

240 N.L.R.B. 905 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Westinghouse Electric Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Florida Medical Ctr., Inc.

    576 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 34 times
    In NLRB v. Florida Medical Center Inc., 576 F.2d 666, 674 (5th Cir. 1978), the court pointed out that when the Board does not accept the findings of the ALJ, the reviewing court has an obligation to examine the evidence and findings of the Board more critically than it would if the Board and the ALJ were in agreement.

  4. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    530 F.2d 137 (10th Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times
    In Groendyke the record showed that the rule was actively enforced in an unlawful manner to prevent any distribution or solicitation "on Company premises at any time."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Transport, Inc.

    343 F.2d 558 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17667. April 14, 1965. Duane R. Batista, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the petitioner and filed brief with Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. Karl Mueller, of Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., made argument for the respondent and filed brief with Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex. Before MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges, and

  7. N.L.R.B. v. East Texas Pulp Paper Company

    346 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 1 times

    No. 21291. June 8, 1965. Allen M. Hutter, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John B. Abercrombie, Houston, Tex., Baker, Botts, Shepherd Coates, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for respondent. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge. HANNAY, District Judge: This is a petition for enforcement of an NLRB order