§

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

163 N.L.R.B. 503 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Westinghouse Electric Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Manning, Maxwell Moore, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 26 times

    No. 20674. November 27, 1963. Andrew P. Carter, Eugene G. Taggart, Monroe Lemann, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Manning, Maxwell Moore, Inc., entered into an agreement for a consent election as to whether a

  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    113 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1940)   Cited 51 times
    In Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, 113 F.2d 698, 702, we expressed the opinion that the practice which should be followed by a trial examiner in taking evidence and ruling upon objections to evidence is that which applies to special masters in equity proceedings, and "that the record should contain all evidence offered by any party in interest, except such as is palpably incompetent * *."

  4. General Instrument Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    319 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1963)   Cited 9 times

    No. 8869. Argued April 4, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. Jesse Freidin, New York City (Herbert Prashker, Eric Rosenfeld, and Poletti, Freidin, Prashker Harnett, New York City, on brief), for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for respondent. Donald Grody, New York City (Abramson Lewis

  5. N.L.R.B. v. United Dairies

    337 F.2d 283 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 3 times

    No. 7663. October 19, 1964. George B. Driesen, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip A. Rouse, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. HILL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order issued on August 22, 1963, against respondent

  6. Memphis Moldings, Inc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    341 F.2d 534 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15830. February 26, 1965. Robert L. Taylor, Memphis, Tenn., John T. Dwyer, Memphis, Tenn., on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence M. Joseph, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before MILLER and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, District Judge. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board found that the