West Motor Freight of Pennsylvania

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 657 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Bourne v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 93 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
McClanahan v. United States
230 F.2d 919 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 76 times
Upholding the conviction of an accomplice who caused to be made such statements of purpose where applicant had no real intent to occupy the premises
N.L.R.B. v. American Art Industries, Inc.
415 F.2d 1223 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 15 times
Upholding the Bannon Mills principle and recognizing that "to maintain the integrity of the hearing process" the ALJ properly refused to admit secondary evidence proffered by the employer which it refused to produce in the face of a valid subpoena duces tecum
N.L.R.B. v. Rubin
424 F.2d 748 (2d Cir. 1970) Cited 13 times
No. 451, Docket 33820. Argued March 31, 1970. Decided April 17, 1970. Julius Rosenbaum, Washington, D.C., Attorney (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Eugene B. Granof, Atty., on the brief), for petitioner. Leon M. Labes, New York City (Auerbach Labes, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and TIMBERS, District Judge. Chief Judge of the District of Connecticut
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,894 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

West Motor Freight of Pennsylvania

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Bourne v. N.L.R.B

In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

McClanahan v. United States

Upholding the conviction of an accomplice who caused to be made such statements of purpose where applicant had no real intent to occupy the premises

N.L.R.B. v. American Art Industries, Inc.

Upholding the Bannon Mills principle and recognizing that "to maintain the integrity of the hearing process" the ALJ properly refused to admit secondary evidence proffered by the employer which it refused to produce in the face of a valid subpoena duces tecum

N.L.R.B. v. Rubin

Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions