WELLS ENTERPRISES, INC.
6 Cited authorities
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,674 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Local 1814, Int. Longshoremen's v. N.L.R.B
735 F.2d 1384 (D.C. Cir. 1984) Cited 23 timesUpholding Board in decertifying union due to illegal kickback agreement between union officials and employer
Utrad Corporation v. N.L.R.B
454 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1972) Cited 20 timesIn Utrad, the court held that an isolated statement by a foreman made without the knowledge or acquiescence of higher management authority and threatening a plant closing upon a union victory did not violate section 8(a)(1).
Confectionery and Tobacco Drivers v. N.L.R.B
312 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1963) Cited 17 timesFinding condonation
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera
179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 24 timesNo. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease
N.L.R.B. v. Post Publishing Company
311 F.2d 565 (7th Cir. 1962) Cited 9 timesPermitting union to hold meetings in company cafeteria, use copier and retain profits from cafeteria operations "a permissible form of friendly cooperation designed to foster and resulting in uninterrupted harmonious labor-management relations" not intended to coerce employees