Wells Aluminum Corp.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Emich Motors v. General Motors

    340 U.S. 558 (1951)   Cited 458 times
    Holding that "plaintiffs are entitled to introduce the prior judgment to establish prima facie all matters of fact and law necessarily decided by the conviction and the verdict on which it was based"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Mattison Machine Works

    365 U.S. 123 (1961)   Cited 62 times
    Requiring showing of "prejudice to the fairness of the election"
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.

    415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 95 times
    In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.
  7. U.S. v. Barrett

    837 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir. 1988)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that district courts cannot place conditions on enforcement of a summons, but must simply decide "whether to enforce or not to enforce the summons"
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc.

    486 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 42 times
    In NLRB v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc., 486 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1973), we recognized two reasons for discounting third party misconduct.
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Shrader's, Inc.

    928 F.2d 194 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 10 times
    Invalidating an election where the union gave out hats and T-shirts throughout the voting periods
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Basic Wire Products, Inc.

    516 F.2d 261 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 26 times
    Stating that the NLRB "properly refused to invalidate the election or to hold a hearing on the allegations" of election abuses where "[t]he only evidence proffered by [employer] was an affidavit of its Vice President to the effect that `union people' told several employees `that it would pay to support the Union'"
  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions