Webco Industries, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"
  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law
  3. Farmer v. Carpenters

    430 U.S. 290 (1977)   Cited 607 times
    Holding that an otherwise preempted claim could be prosecuted in state or federal court if the conduct alleged was sufficiently outrageous
  4. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
  5. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 732 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
  6. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale

    463 U.S. 491 (1983)   Cited 277 times
    Holding that the NLRA does not preempt state law contract actions by replacement workers to enforce terms of an employment contract
  7. Operating Engineers v. Jones

    460 U.S. 669 (1983)   Cited 183 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a tortious interference with contract claim preempted
  8. Hanna Mining v. Marine Engineers

    382 U.S. 181 (1965)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that "the Board's statement [that the engineers were supervisors and thus not subject to the NLRA] does resolve the question with the clarity necessary to avoid preemption"
  9. Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    240 F.3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Deferring to the NLRB's citation of a "company's decision to seek treble damages as additional evidence of retaliatory motive" but noting that "had the suit not been so meritless — our view might be different" (citing Kline v. Coldwell Banker Co., 508 F.2d 226, 235 (9th Cir. 1974) (characterizing antitrust treble damages as punitive))
  10. Wright Elec., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    200 F.3d 1162 (8th Cir. 2000)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-2121, 99-2309 Submitted: October 20, 1999 Filed: January 19, 2000 Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Gregg J. Caveneau of Maple Grove, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Julie B. Brodio of NLRB of Washington, D.C. Nora H. Leyland of Washington, D.C. argued for Amicus IBEW. Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Wright Electric