327 U.S. 251 (1946) Cited 986 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"
Holding that NLRB had not erred by counting former employee's self-employment wages and search for work outside normal line of work as mitigating his income loss
Holding that employee was entitled to reinstatement even though the employee was terminated for conduct unrelated to his union activities (gross insubordination) because employee was wrongfully reinstated without his seniority following his participation in a sympathy strike
Stating that discriminatee need only seek employment "substantially equivalent to" former job and is not required to "seek or retain a job more onerous than the job from which he or she was discharged"
Granting the Board's order for enforcement where employer did not present necessary "sufficient credible evidence" to support assertions that Board's calculations were wrong