ยง

Webber American, Inc.

194 N.L.R.B. 692 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Webber American, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  2. Majestic Molded Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corporation of America

    291 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 2 Cir., 291 F.2d 328, 331, the rule under discussion is stated, "Interrogation of employees is legal, when the questioning is not accompanied by any explicit threats, cf. N.L.R.B. v. Beaner [Beaver] Meadow Creamery, 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 247, if under all the circumstances coercion is not implicit in the questioning.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Tepper

    297 F.2d 280 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Processing of milk by an employer who was primarily a processor and processed milk from other farms not included under exemption

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Sun Hardware Company

    422 F.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 1 times

    No. 24723. March 11, 1970. Ronald Greenberg (argued), Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Wilson Clark (argued), of Brundage Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court, Central District of California, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM. Petitioner, the

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Lively Service Company

    290 F.2d 205 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    No. 6473. April 21, 1961. Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard L. Pickering, Albuquerque, N.M., for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KERR, District Judge. KERR, District Judge. Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. ยง 160(e), the National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for a decree enforcing the order of the Board requiring respondent to cease and desist from certain unfair

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Piezo Manufacturing Corporation

    290 F.2d 455 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times

    No. 325, Docket 26757. Argued April 11, 1961. Decided May 8, 1961. Jules Gordon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Vincent W. Bradley, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. William Chester Taplitz, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tak Trak, Inc.

    293 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17194. August 1, 1961. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Jules H. Gordon, Attys. for N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton and Frank Simpson, III, and David A. Maddux, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before ORR, BARNES and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the Board) has petitioned this