§

Wean Manufacturing Co.

147 N.L.R.B. 112 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Wean Manufacturing Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Holland Mfg. Co.

    292 F.2d 840 (3d Cir. 1961)

    No. 13519. Argued June 6, 1961. Decided July 31, 1961. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. No appearance for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board