W.E. Carlson Corp.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Riverwoods Chappaqua v. Marine Midland Bank

    30 F.3d 339 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 264 times
    Holding that an appellate court can affirm a district court's order "on any basis for which there is a record sufficient to permit conclusions of law, including grounds upon which the district court did not rely"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. United States v. McKeon

    738 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 231 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an opening statement made by an attorney is admissible in a later lawsuit against his client
  5. Birch Run Welding Fabricating, v. N.L.R.B

    761 F.2d 1175 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 35 times
    Ordering general layoffs to discourage or retaliate against union activity is unlawful discrimination, even though some employees opposed to the union were laid-off as well
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adco Electric Inc.

    6 F.3d 1110 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that employee "recommend[ing] someone for hire and [bringing] problems with apprentice employees to the attention of [his superior] is nothing more than what [the employer] would expect from experienced employees"
  7. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"
  8. WXGI, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    243 F.3d 833 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 11 times
    Recognizing that this Court will not disturb Board's credibility findings absent "extraordinary circumstances"
  9. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
  10. RGC (USA) Mineral Sands, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    281 F.3d 442 (4th Cir. 2002)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 01-1174, 01-1371. Argued November 2, 2001. Decided February 22, 2002. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Michael J. Bobroff, Bobroff, Hesse, Lindmark Martone, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri, for RGC. Jeffrey Michael Hirsch, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Board. ON BRIEF: John H. Ferguson, Associate General, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General, Sharon I. Block, Supervisory Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.