§

W.C. McQuaide, Inc.

319 N.L.R.B. 756 (N.L.R.B. 1995)
W.C. McQuaide, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  5. Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that the NLRB possessed substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that a supervisor violated § 158 when he told employees that he heard from ownership that unionization would lead to the owners shutting down the plant

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. Mon River Towing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    421 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 27 times
    Recognizing that the involvement of supervisory union members in union affairs conflicts with "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Arrow Molded Plastics, Inc.

    653 F.2d 280 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 11 times

    No. 79-1550. July 13, 1981. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Joseph Schwachter, Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Roger Benko, Thornburg, McGill, Deahl, Harman, Carey Murray, Elkhart, Ind., Lawrence C. DiNardo, for respondent. Before WEICK, KEITH and JONES, Circuit Judges. NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) seeks enforcement of its order directing Arrow Molded Plastics

  9. Eastern Greyhound Lines v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 15477. October 13, 1964. Theodore Voorhees, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner, Matthew J. Broderick, Philadelphia, Pa., Foster J. Fludine, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit

  10. Warner Company v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 435 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 19 times

    No. 15644. Argued May 6, 1966. Decided September 6, 1966. Robert Kleeb, Philadelphia, Pa. (Arthur R. Littleton, John C. Peet, Jr., Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., Richard C. Hotvedt, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert Giannasi, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent