§

Wayron, LLC

19-CA-032983 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 29, 2012)
Wayron, LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  4. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  5. Graphic Communications Int. v. N.L.R.B

    977 F.2d 1168 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 14 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-3901. Argued September 25, 1992. Decided October 21, 1992. Lee W. Jackson, Martin Ganzglass, O'Donnell, Schwartz Anderson, Washington, D.C., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr. (argued), Logothetis Pence, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Lawrence T. Zimmerman (argued), Washington, D.C., Charles M. Roesch, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Utility Wkrs

    490 F.2d 1383 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 11 times
    Finding union to have violated NLRA by "insisting that final settlements of the collective-bargaining contracts covering separate units of employees of Ohio Power, Central Operating, and Wheeling Electric be withheld until final agreement was reached between the Respondents and the Employers in all the units in which the bargaining was taking place."