§

Wayneview Care Center

352 N.L.R.B. 1089 (N.L.R.B. 2008)
Wayneview Care Center

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Chicago Typographical v. Chicago Sun-Times

    935 F.2d 1501 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even where interpretive route is not spelled out or there is an "error in interpretation," the award stands as long as there is a "possible interpretive route to the award"

  3. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    402 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005)   Cited 22 times
    Contrasting lawfully speeding up a long-planned operational change due to union activity, with unlawfully "suddenly decid[ing] to find a way to cut back ... to spite the Union"

  4. Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. N.L.R.B

    924 F.2d 1078 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that brevity of parties' negotiations on issue and union's position that it still "had more movement to make" undermine employer's declaration of impasse

  5. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second