§

Wayne Perron, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01a05805 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 13, 2001)
Wayne Perron, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 243,826 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"

  2. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  3. Burrus v. United Telephone Co. of Kan., Inc.

    683 F.2d 339 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 405 times
    Holding that three years between the protected activity and the adverse employment action was too long to establish the third element

  4. Mitchell v. Baldrige

    759 F.2d 80 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 361 times
    Holding that it is defendant's burden to produce "evidence of selectees' superior qualifications," which plaintiff need not anticipate and rebut in establishing his prima facie case

  5. Spangle v. Valley Forge Sewer Authority

    839 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 61 times
    Affirming grant of summary judgment where employee presented no evidence to show he was qualified for the job

  6. Redman v. Warrener

    516 F.2d 766 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times
    In Redman v. Warrener, 516 F.2d 766, 768 (1st Cir. 1975), we admonished: "Summary judgment is not to be turned into a trial by affidavit."