Wayne Electric Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status
  2. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  3. Sakrete of Northern Calif., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times

    No. 18745. May 21, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1964. Graydon, Head Ritchey, William A. McKenzie, Leslie A. Meek, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Orman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Leon Ardzrooni, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., on behalf of amicus curiae-Freight, Construction, General Drivers Helpers, Local 287. Before MADDEN

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Mansion House Center Management

    473 F.2d 471 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 15 times
    In Mansion House the Eighth Circuit held that the Board could not require an employer to bargain with a discriminating union.
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

    307 F.2d 428 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times
    Granting enforcement petition based on finding that "there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion" viewing the "separate legal entities as a single employing enterprise"
  7. Storm v. United States

    94 U.S. 76 (1876)   Cited 55 times
    In Storm v. United States, 94 U.S. 76, the Supreme Court observed that "litigants ought to prepare their cases for trial before the jury is empanelled and sworn; and, if they do not, they cannot complain if the court excludes questions propounded merely to ascertain the names of persons whom they may desire to call as witnesses to disprove the case of the opposite party."
  8. Section 621 - Congressional statement of findings and purpose

    29 U.S.C. § 621   Cited 17,648 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs"