§

Washington Manor Nursing Center

211 N.L.R.B. 324 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Washington Manor Nursing Center

11 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times

    No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Gulfmont Hotel Company

    362 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 43 times

    No. 22340. June 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This petition by the

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

    414 F.2d 1084 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times

    No. 19427. August 19, 1969. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jonathan M. Marks, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Richard A. Brackhahn, of Fowler, Brackhahn Young, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge, and VOGEL and HEANEY, Circuit Judges

  5. Richmond v. Weiner

    353 F.2d 41 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that the district court continued to exercise jurisdiction over a nonfederal claim following bifurcation of the claim from federal issues

  6. Darlington Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    397 F.2d 760 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 17 times
    Affirming without discussion

  7. N.L.R.B. v. John S. Swift Company

    302 F.2d 342 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times
    Excluding "the period during which the bargaining relationship was suspended by litigation of the Company's unfair labor practices"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.

    359 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.

  9. Fairmont Foods Company v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 828 (4th Cir. 1969)

    No. 12680. Argued January 10, 1969. Decided February 28, 1969. Carl D. Hall, Tulsa, Okla. (John M. Keefer, and Hall Sublett, Tulsa, Okla., on brief) for petitioner. Seth D. Rosen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for respondent. Before BOREMAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before the court upon petition of Fairmont Foods

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Plastic Prod

    175 F.2d 755 (4th Cir. 1949)   Cited 15 times

    No. 5868. Argued April 6, 1949. Decided June 1, 1949. Rehearing Denied July 5, 1949. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on the petition of National Labor Relations Board against the National Plastic Products Company for enforcement of an order of the board directing respondent to bargain with the International Chemical Workers Union and to cease and desist from interfering with its employees in their efforts at self organization. Order enforced