Washington Hospital Center

10 Cited authorities

Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 228 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 50 times
Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
Procter Gamble Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B
603 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1979) Cited 17 times
No. 78-1716. Submitted March 12, 1979. Decided August 23, 1979. Harold S. Freeman of Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued and Michael S. Glassman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on appendix and briefs, for petitioner. Edward S. Dorsey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. argued, and Andrew E. Tranovich, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel; John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel; Robert E. Allen, Acting Assoc. Gen. Counsel; and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C.,
Western Mass. Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B
589 F.2d 42 (1st Cir. 1978) Cited 14 times
Nos. 78-1099, 78-1105. Argued September 11, 1978. Decided December 18, 1978. R. Malcolm Graham, Boston, Mass. with whom Melvin Pierce, Frank Giso, III, and Peabody, Brown, Rowley Storey, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. Peter M. Bernstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Susan Tepper Papadopoulos, Atty., Washington
Teleprompter Corp. v. N.L.R.B
570 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1977) Cited 14 times
In Teleprompter Corp. v. NLRB, 570 F.2d 4, 9 (1st Cir. 1977), this court held, "[w]hen the employer itself puts profitability in contention — as by asserting an inability to pay an increase in wages — information to substantiate the employer's position has to be disclosed."
Washington Hosp. Center v. Service Employees
577 F. Supp. 206 (D.D.C. 1983) Cited 3 times
In Service Employees International Union Local 722 v. Washington Hospital Center, 115 LRRM 3581 (D.D.C. 1983) [Available on WESTLAW, DCT database], a suit brought to confirm an arbitration award, Judge Joyce Green held "[a]s a preliminary matter, the Court can readily dismiss the [defendant's] contention that plaintiff's claim is time barred.
J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

Washington Hospital Center

10 Cited authorities

Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

In Teleprompter Corp. v. NLRB, 570 F.2d 4, 9 (1st Cir. 1977), this court held, "[w]hen the employer itself puts profitability in contention — as by asserting an inability to pay an increase in wages — information to substantiate the employer's position has to be disclosed."

In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.