§

Washington Fruit & Produce Co.

343 N.L.R.B. 1215 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Washington Fruit & Produce Co.

23 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 49 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  6. TRW, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    654 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 32 times
    Noting that "language used by the parties involved in a union representation campaign ... must be considered in light of the circumstances existing when such language was spoken "

  7. Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B

    73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining

  8. Holly Farms Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    48 F.3d 1360 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that employer had a duty to bargain with union over the effects of a merger on “wages, hours, work rules, work schedules, and work locations”

  9. N.L.R.B. v. United Sanitation Service

    737 F.2d 936 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 22 times
    Reversing ALJ's decision to admit dead witness's self-serving affidavit because no "clear basis of trustworthiness" found

  10. Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)

  11. Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 901   Cited 5,322 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication

  12. Rule 807 - Residual Exception

    Fed. R. Evid. 807   Cited 1,617 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Requiring "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" under the residual exception to the hearsay rule

  13. Form 7 - Declaration of Inmate Filing

    Fed. R. App. P. 7   Cited 226 times   2 Legal Analyses

    ______________________________________________ [insert name of court; for example, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota] A.B., Plaintiff v. }Case No.________ C.D., Defendant I am an inmate confined in an institution. Today, ________ [insert date], I am depositing the ________ [insert title of document; for example, "notice of appeal"] in this case in the institution's internal mail system. First-class postage is being prepaid either by me or by the institution on my behalf.

  14. Section 785.48 - Use of time clocks

    29 C.F.R. § 785.48   Cited 159 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to compensate employees for "all the time they have actually worked"