§

Warren Unilube, Inc.

358 N.L.R.B. 816 (N.L.R.B. 2012)
Warren Unilube, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. Bulk Carriers v. Arguelles

    400 U.S. 351 (1971)   Cited 127 times
    Holding that the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) did not abrogate the Seaman's Wage Act remedy

  2. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

  3. Vanguard Fire Supply Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    468 F.3d 952 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 05-2497, 05-2630. Argued: September 20, 2006. Decided and Filed: November 21, 2006. Appeal from the petition for review of final National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). ARGUED: Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner. Stacy G. Zimmerman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Jason J. Valtos, Osborne Law Offices, Washington, D.C., for Intervener. ON BRIEF: Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner. Stacy G. Zimmerman

  4. United Food v. N.L.R.B

    519 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 06-1358, 07-1060, 07-1087. Argued January 23, 2008. Decided March 14, 2008. On Petitions for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. George Wiszynski, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner, United Food and Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO. Steven D. Wheeless, argued the cause for petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. With him on the briefs was Bennett Evan Cooper. Philip A. Hostak, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Laney Duke Storage Warehouse Co.

    369 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 59 times
    In Laney Duke, the ALJ had ordered the employer to read the notice to any employee who requested it, but the Board had expanded this to require a reading to all employees, singly or collectively, whether or not requested. The Fifth Circuit denied enforcement because it considered this remedy "unnecessarily embarrassing and humiliating to management rather than effectuating the policies of the Act."

  6. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 24 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mike O'Connor Chevrolet-Buick-GMC Co.

    512 F.2d 684 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times

    No. 74-1645. Submitted February 13, 1975. Decided March 18, 1975. Charles A. Shaw, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles Kelso, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY, Circuit Judge, and WANGELIN and NANGLE, District Judges. H. KENNETH WANGELIN and JOHN F. NANGLE, District Judges, Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  8. Section 654 - Duties of employers and employees

    29 U.S.C. § 654   Cited 611 times   101 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to "comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this chapter"