§

Wanda Freeman, Appellant, v. Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, Agency.

01970429_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 2, 1999)
Wanda Freeman, Appellant, v. Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Warth v. Seldin

    422 U.S. 490 (1975)   Cited 12,325 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"

  2. County of Los Angeles v. Davis

    440 U.S. 625 (1979)   Cited 1,819 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that voluntary cessation can render an issue moot if “there is no reasonable expectation ... that the alleged violation will recur”

  3. Berry v. Board of Sup'rs of L.S.U

    715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 524 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding mere allegation that a female professor was paid less than a male colleague for equal work stated a claim under the EPA

  4. Scott v. Claytor

    469 F. Supp. 22 (D.D.C. 1978)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that three denied promotions over the course of three years, where the decisions were made by three different selection officials and involved different qualifications were not sufficiently related to constitute a continuing violation