11 Cited authorities
Conley v. Gibson
355 U.S. 41 (1957) Cited 59,248 times 25 Legal AnalysesHolding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
Walling v. Helmerich Payne
323 U.S. 37 (1944) Cited 301 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding controversy remained where defendant "ha[d] consistently urged the validity of the [practice] and would presumably be free to resume [it] were not some effective restraint made"
Labor Board v. Warren Company
350 U.S. 107 (1955) Cited 39 timesNoting that Congress gave the NLRB civil contempt power to enforce compliance with the NLRB's orders
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 timesIn Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
Wausau Steel Corporation v. N.L.R.B
377 F.2d 369 (7th Cir. 1967) Cited 21 timesNo. 15840. April 11, 1967. Richard P. Tinkham, of Smith, Puchner, Tinkham Smith, Wausau, Wis., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. The Wausau Steel Corporation
Stark Ceramics, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
375 F.2d 202 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 7 timesNo. 17008. April 6, 1967. Charles R. Iden, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner. Alan D. Eisenburg, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mellet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Cushman, Anthony J. Obadal, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Before PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge, and HOGAN, District Judge. Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, United
N.L.R.B. v. J.W. Mays, Inc.
356 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 7 timesNo. 76, Docket 29497. Argued November 12, 1965. Decided March 2, 1966. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Seymour W. Miller, New York City (Miller Seeger, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge: The
Taylor Forge Pipe Works v. N.L.R.B
234 F.2d 227 (7th Cir. 1956) Cited 16 timesNo. 11617. June 6, 1956. Robert W. MacDonald, Henry E. Seyfarth, Lee C. Shaw, Owen Fairweather, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mozart G. Ratner, Jacobs, Kamin Ratner, Chicago, Ill., for Forge and Machine Workers
Old King Cole v. National Labor Relations Bd.
260 F.2d 530 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 13 timesFiling petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board's order, consistent with Section 10(g) of the NLRA