36 Cited authorities
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
136 S. Ct. 2117 (2016) Cited 371 times 18 Legal AnalysesHolding that agency needed to provide "a more reasoned explanation for its decision to depart from its existing ... policy" in light of serious and ongoing industry reliance on prior policy when negotiating compensation packages
Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 483 (1978) Cited 219 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 493 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Central Hardware Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
407 U.S. 539 (1972) Cited 142 times 3 Legal AnalysesFinding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Relco Locomotives, Inc.
734 F.3d 764 (8th Cir. 2013) Cited 95 timesHolding that a challenge to the composition of the National Labor Relations Board under the Recess Appointments Clause was not jurisdictional and could be forfeited if not raised to the Board
HealthBridge Management, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
798 F.3d 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2015) Cited 12 times 2 Legal AnalysesNos. 14–1101 14–1116. 2015-08-18 HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Erin E. Murphy argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the briefs were Paul D. Clement and William R. Levi. Jared D. Cantor, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General
In-N-Out Burger, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
894 F.3d 707 (5th Cir. 2018) Cited 9 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 17-60241 07-06-2018 IN-N-OUT BURGER, INCORPORATED, Petitioner Cross-Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Cross-Petitioner Bruce J. Sarchet, Littler Mendelson, Sacramento, Edward F. Berbarie, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Dallas, for Petitioner Cross-Respondent. Linda Dreeben, Esq., Deputy Associate General Counsel, Elizabeth Ann Heaney, Esq., National Labor Relations Board Appellate & Supreme Court Litigation Branch, Washington, Mischa Kristian Bauermeister, Esq., Timothy L. Watson
Boch Imports, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
826 F.3d 558 (1st Cir. 2016) Cited 9 timesRejecting employer's reliance on W San Diego
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 16 times 2 Legal AnalysesStriking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Goya Foods
525 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2008) Cited 13 timesApproving a decertification bar lasting up to one year
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 26,595 times 252 Legal AnalysesAdopting the Daubert standard