§
Wackenhut Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 181 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. Bridgeport v. Assn. Against Discrim

    455 U.S. 988 (1982)   Cited 138 times
    Granting summary judgment in defendant's favor in antitrust case, finding "no significant probative evidence of a conspiracy"

  5. Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 31 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

  6. Beverly California Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    227 F.3d 817 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may not probe directly or indirectly into an employee's reasons for supporting a union

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.

    79 F.3d 1030 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times

    No. 95-9509. Filed March 28, 1996. Joseph J. Jablonski Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Charles Donnelly, Supervisory Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for Petitioner. Stephen L. Andrew (D. Kevin Ikenberry with him on the brief), of Stephen L. Andrew Associates, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for

  8. Furniture Rentors of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1240 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not required to bargain over subcontracting because decision was based on reduced productivity, damaged product, customer complaints, and employee theft rather than labor costs

  9. Dorsey Trailers v. National Labor Relations

    134 F.3d 125 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 96-3392 and 96-3578. Argued June 26, 1997. Filed January 13, 1998. Michael S. Mitchell, Esq., Robert E. Larkin, III, Esq., Fisher Phillips, 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3710, New Orleans, Louisiana 70170, Attorneys for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, Dorsey Trailers. Robert J. Englehart, Esq., Charles P. Donnelly, Esq., Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20570, Attorney for Respondent/Cross Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board

  10. N.L.R.B. v. United Technologies Corp.

    884 F.2d 1569 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 1095, 1096, Dockets 89-4003, 89-4009. Argued May 8, 1989. Decided September 13, 1989. Edward J. Dempsey, Director, Indus. Relations Labor Counsel, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, Conn., for respondent/intervenor United Technologies Corp. Judith P. Flower, Washington, D.C. (Barbara A. Atkin, Supervisory Attorney, Joseph E. Desio, Acting Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for