§
W. R. Grace Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  2. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Murray-Ohio Manufacturing Company

    358 F.2d 948 (6th Cir. 1966)   Cited 11 times

    No. 16413. April 19, 1966. Robert B. Schwartz, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., on brief, for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before us on the petition

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Steele Apparel Company

    437 F.2d 933 (8th Cir. 1971)

    No. 20171. February 4, 1971. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Michael F. Rosenblum, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edward R. Lev, James W. Gladden, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for respondent; Mayer, Brown Platt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and HANSON, District Judge. VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge. This case is before this court upon the