W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

26 Cited authorities

Edison Co. v. Labor Board
305 U.S. 197 (1938) Cited 19,302 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
Cohen v. California
403 U.S. 15 (1971) Cited 1,271 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding "absent a . . . particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First and Fourteenth Amendments, make the simple public display . . . of single four-letter expletive [on a shirt] a criminal offense"
Letter Carriers v. Austin
418 U.S. 264 (1974) Cited 609 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.
397 U.S. 920 (1970) Cited 200 times 5 Legal Analyses
Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
396 U.S. 258 (1969) Cited 184 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.
312 U.S. 287 (1941) Cited 382 times
Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Papish v. University of Missouri Curators
410 U.S. 667 (1973) Cited 110 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that university violated First Amendment by expelling student for printing indecent newspaper despite student code prohibiting “indecent conduct or speech”
Labor Board v. Electrical Workers
346 U.S. 464 (1953) Cited 125 times 41 Legal Analyses
Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

26 Cited authorities

Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

Holding "absent a . . . particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First and Fourteenth Amendments, make the simple public display . . . of single four-letter expletive [on a shirt] a criminal offense"

Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Holding that university violated First Amendment by expelling student for printing indecent newspaper despite student code prohibiting “indecent conduct or speech”

Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute