Vulcan Trailer Manufacturing Co., Inc.
6 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Blake Const. Co., Inc.
663 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981) Cited 41 timesHolding that petitioner's exception "to the ALJ's conclusions of law as `based on misstatements of facts, mistaken premises, suppositions, hearsay, and misapplication of law'" sufficiently preserved a due process issue
N.L.R.B. v. Tricor Products, Inc.
636 F.2d 266 (10th Cir. 1980) Cited 41 timesHolding that the establishment of a successor company for economic gain is "irrelevant" in determining whether the purpose of creating that company was also to avoid labor law obligations
Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B
725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984) Cited 23 timesAffirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work
Sturdevant Sheet Metal Roofing v. N.L.R.B
636 F.2d 271 (10th Cir. 1980) Cited 2 timesNo. 79-1019. Argued September 17, 1980. Decided November 20, 1980. Douglas G. Voeglar, Albuquerque, N. M. (Leonard L. Pickering and Wayne E. Bingham, of Pickering Bingham, Albuquerque, N. M., with him on the brief), for petitioners. L. Joseph Ferrara, Atty., Washington, D.C. (William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R
Section 362 - Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362 Cited 29,939 times 179 Legal AnalysesConcluding that cause exists to lift the stay because no bankruptcy purpose would be served by keeping the stay in place
Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay
Fed. R. Evid. 801 Cited 19,588 times 77 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party