§

Volt Information Sciences, Inc.

274 N.L.R.B. 308 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Volt Information Sciences, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., Inc. of Delaware

    651 F.2d 442 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 651 F.2d 442 (6th Cir. 1981), the court recited the Wright Line test but did not analyze it.

  3. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.

    554 F.2d 996 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 24 times
    Permitting inference

  5. Peavey Co. v. N.L.R.B

    648 F.2d 460 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 19 times
    Noting that "it is undisputed that Snider had been disciplined, for cause, prior to her contact with the union"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Broyhill Company

    514 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 25 times
    In Broyhill, the Eighth Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that McWilliams was a supervisor.

  7. Stein Seal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    605 F.2d 703 (3d Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that the Board was free to make fact findings contrary to the ALJ's so long as they are supported by substantial evidence

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Computed Time Corp.

    587 F.2d 790 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 10 times
    In NLRB v. Computed Time Corporation, 587 F.2d 790, 794 (5th Cir. 1979), the Fifth Circuit noted that "[i]n order for an employer to violate Section 8(a)(1) by illegal surveillance, interrogation or any other unlawful act, he must `interfere with, restrain, [or] coerce' employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights."

  9. Air Surrey Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times
    Vacating the Board's order because substantial evidence did not show that the employee's supervisor knew of his protected activity

  10. Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    666 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 5 times

    No. 81-4177. Summary Calendar. January 22, 1982. Fulbright Jaworski, T. J. Wray, Houston, Tex., for Central Freight Lines, Inc. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: This labor dispute grew out of an organizational campaign launched by the International Association