§

Vm Industries, Inc.

291 N.L.R.B. 5 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Vm Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Smith v. Evening News Assn

    371 U.S. 195 (1962)   Cited 816 times
    Holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 116 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  4. Texaco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    722 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 7 times
    Recognizing that an employer's actions were unlawful when the employer, inter alia, "initiated and stimulated the activity that led to the employees' withdrawal from the Union," even though the employer had previously learned of employee dissatisfaction

  5. N.L.R.B. v. George E. Light Boat Storage, Inc.

    373 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times

    No. 22962. February 28, 1967. As Modified March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard S. Rodin, Atty., NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert R. Breaker, LaPorte, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, BELL, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks a decree enforcing its order of July 2, 1965, against the George E. Light

  6. Southern Conference of Teamsters v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc.

    374 F.2d 932 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times
    In Southern Conference of Teamsters v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., 374 F.2d 932, 938 (5th Cir. 1967), we held that "[i]f the employer commits an act which demonstrates in any way a preference for one union over the other, it has interfered with the fundamental right of its employees to choose their own representative."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hershey Chocolate Corporation

    297 F.2d 286 (3d Cir. 1961)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 13523, 13539. Argued September 19, 1961. Decided December 1, 1961. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Herbert A. Simon, New York City (Milton M. Levin, New York City, on the brief), for Harry Landvater and others. Bernard N. Katz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Meranze, Katz Spear, Philadelphia