§

VLSI Technology LLC

IPR2021-01056 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 23, 2021)
VLSI Technology LLC

7 Cited authorities

  1. VLSI Tech. v. Intel Corp.

    Lead Case: 1:19-CV-977-ADA (W.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2021)   1 Legal Analyses

    Lead Case: 1:19-CV-977-ADA 6:21-CV-00299-ADA 04-12-2021 VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendants. ALAN D ALBRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendant Intel Corporations' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Pre-Complaint Damages Under 35 U.S.C. § 287 filed on October 8, 2020. ECF No. 258. Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC filed a timely Response to the Motion on October 22, 2020. ECF No. 303. Intel filed a Reply on

  2. Turner v. Enrille

    4 U.S. 7 (1799)   Cited 6 times

    AUGUST TERM, 1799. For the defendant in error, Dallas lamented the obvious irregularities on the face of the record, though the merits were incontestably established in his favour, by the verdict and judgment. He thought, however, that the Court would give every reasonable intendment to the allegations of the record, in support of the judgment and verdict; and, therefore, endeavoured to distinguish the present case from the case of Bingham v. Cabot et al. 3 Dall. Rep. 382. In Bingham v. Cabot et

  3. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 381 times   636 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  4. Section 316 - Conduct of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 316   Cited 298 times   314 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "the petitioner shall have the burden of proving a proposition of unpatentability"

  5. Section 324 - Institution of post-grant review

    35 U.S.C. § 324   Cited 42 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Requiring threshold determination that it is "more likely than not that at least 1 of the claims . . . is unpatentable"

  6. Section 42.51 - Discovery

    37 C.F.R. § 42.51   Cited 36 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing additional discovery when it is "in the interests of justice"

  7. Section 42.53 - Taking testimony

    37 C.F.R. § 42.53   Cited 4 times   21 Legal Analyses

    (a)Form. Uncompelled direct testimony must be submitted in the form of an affidavit. All other testimony, including testimony compelled under 35 U.S.C. 24 , must be in the form of a deposition transcript. Parties may agree to video-recorded testimony, but may not submit such testimony without prior authorization of the Board. In addition, the Board may authorize or require live or video-recorded testimony. (b)Time and location. (1) Uncompelled direct testimony may be taken at any time to support