§

Vitek Electronics

268 N.L.R.B. 522 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
Vitek Electronics

27 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.

    415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 95 times
    In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.

  2. Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 43 times
    Affirming the Board's finding that a supervisor's statement was coercive, despite employee testimony suggesting otherwise, because the record supported both interpretations

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc.

    486 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 42 times
    In NLRB v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc., 486 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1973), we recognized two reasons for discounting third party misconduct.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    423 F.2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 42 times
    In Frick itself, we upheld the Board policy of applying an irrebuttable presumption of continued majority status for a "reasonable period of time" to voluntarily recognized unions, and applying a rebuttable presumption thereafter. 423 F.2d at 1332.

  5. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

  6. Chromalloy Min. and Minerals, v. N.L.R.B

    620 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 19 times
    Enforcing Gissel Order where employer refused to recall a union-supporting employee for his usual seasonal employment, threatened to close the plant, and promised a benefit to one employee if he opposed the union

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Nixon Gear, Inc.

    649 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 671, Docket 80-4239. Argued February 4, 1981. Decided May 26, 1981. Richard S. Zuckerman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Brian E. Hayes, Skoler, Abbott Hayes, P.C., Springfield, Mass., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD

  8. Jamesway Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    676 F.2d 63 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    Noting that NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324 "accords the NLRB wide discretion in formulating election procedures . . ."

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Van Gorp Corp.

    615 F.2d 759 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 13 times
    Noting that "a number of insubstantial objections to an election" are insufficient to overturn an election

  10. N.L.R.B. v. S. Prawer Co.

    584 F.2d 1099 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 14 times

    No. 78-1030. Argued June 5, 1978. Decided September 27, 1978. Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B, Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold N. Mack, Boston, Mass., with whom Philip J. Moss, and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Petition