Virginia Mason Medical Center

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
  2. Ezekwo v. Amer. Bd. of I. M

    173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 169 times
    Finding that plaintiff "failed to effect proper service" and noting that "'leave and mail' service under Section 308 is ineffective where a plaintiff does not file proof of service with the clerk within twenty days of the date on which the process server mailed the summons and complaint"
  3. Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    285 F.3d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 00-1443. Argued November 1, 2001. Decided April 12, 2002. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Donald H. Scharg argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Steven J. Fishman and Thomas A. Pinch. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  4. N.L.R.B. v. National Medical Hosp. of Compton

    907 F.2d 905 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 7 times

    No. 89-70054. Argued and Submitted November 16, 1989. Decided July 5, 1990. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing August 29, 1990. Frederick Havard, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Richard Thesing, Menlo Park, Cal., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER, NELSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: In this unusually protracted labor relations controversy, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  5. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    939 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 90-6340, 90-6539. Argued July 18, 1991. Decided August 5, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 18, 1991. Keith A. Ashmus (argued), Carl H. Gluek, Thompson, Hine Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner, cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., John C. Truesdale, Executive Secretary, Margaret E. Luke (argued), N.L.R.B., Office of the Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick Calatrello, Director, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit