Virginia Concrete Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
  3. Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    942 F.2d 151 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 31 times
    Authorizing the Board to issue orders requiring such action "as will effectuate the policies of [the NLRA]"
  4. Ron Tirapelli Ford, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    987 F.2d 433 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 15 times
    Finding in an incumbent union context that "a bargaining order is the appropriate remedy to return the parties to the status quo ante"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hollaender Mfg. Co.

    942 F.2d 321 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 5 times
    Upholding Board's finding that employer lacked good faith basis for withdrawing recognition when employer disenfranchised "a potentially determinative portion of the bargaining unit electorate"
  6. C.H. Guenther Son, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 21 times

    No. 27495. June 1, 1970. Allen P. Schoolfield, Jr., Dallas, Tex., John H. Wood, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail C. Basker, Washington, D.C., N.L.R.B., Clifford W. Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG, and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case is before the Court upon petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against C.H. Guenther Son, Inc., doing