Vinyl Craft Fence Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  4. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Bangor Plastics, Inc.

    392 F.2d 772 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bangor, the Company merely gave administrative reasons why it had accepted the settlement, such reasons having little if any effect on the substantive portion of the agreement.
  7. Lincoln Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    311 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 14 times
    In Lincoln Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 311 F.2d 48, 52 (6th Cir. 1962), the court held that in those circumstances the fact that an employer questioned a least one employee as to how the employee was going to vote in the representation election did not amount to a violation of 8(a)(1) of the Act.
  8. Metal Procs' Un. L. No. 16, v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 114 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 18194. Argued March 25, 1964. Decided June 18, 1964. Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Robert M. Lichtman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Stephen B. Goldberg, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Harold B. Shore

  9. Gilbane Building Company v. Britton

    264 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

    No. 14641. Argued February 25, 1959. Decided March 5, 1959. Mr. M.S. Mazzuchi, Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. Ward E. Boote, Asst. Solicitor, Department of Labor, with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Herbert P. Miller, Attorney, Department of Labor, were on the brief, for appellee Britton. No brief was filed on behalf of appellee Basso. Messrs. Martin E. Gerel and Lee C. Ashcraft, Washington, D.C., entered appearances for appellee Basso. Before