Viking Connectors Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
  2. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc. v. A/S Inger

    375 U.S. 834 (1963)   Cited 82 times
    Holding shipowner's settlement of longshoreman's injury claim reasonable and reversing judgment denying indemnity
  3. N.L.R.B. v. A-1 King Size Sandwiches, Inc.

    732 F.2d 872 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing mandatory subjects of bargaining
  4. Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times

    No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:

  5. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming bargaining order "in view of the serious and pervasive violations disclosed in the record"
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Fitzgerald Mills Corporation

    313 F.2d 260 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 35 times

    Nos. 31, 32, 33, Dockets 27422, 27224, 27318. Argued October 11, 1962. Decided January 9, 1963. Morton Nambow, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Edward Wynne, New York City (Benjamin Wyle, New York City, on the brief), for Textile Workers Union. Theodore R. Iserman, New York City (Kelley Drye Newhall Maginnes

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford

    465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., 465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972), the court found substantial evidence of bad faith where the Company, after months of bargaining leading to the Union's acceptance of its proposals, raised spurious objections to its own proposals, and then stated that it would only sign a contract of seven weeks duration.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. West Coast Casket Company, Inc.

    469 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 19 times

    No. 72-1026. November 17, 1972. Michael Winer, Atty. (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, NLRB, Los Angles, Cal., for petitioner. Carl Minton (argued), of Minton Minton, Michael Posner, of Geffner Satzman, Los Angeles, Cal. (for charging party) for the respondent. Before: HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge. The Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Wonder State Manufacturing Company

    344 F.2d 210 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 27 times
    Finding award of one week's pay to be a gift and not subject to mandatory bargaining
  10. Neon Sign Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    602 F.2d 1203 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 3 times

    No. 77-2383. September 24, 1979. Howard S. Linzy, New Orleans, La., for petitioner cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Vivian A. Miller, Washington, D.C., for respondent cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before JONES, AINSWORTH and HILL, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge: The petitioners, sometimes referred to as the employers, seek review of an order of the National