§

Victor E. Vigil, Jr., et al. Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

01A02257_r (E.E.O.C. Dec. 13, 2002)
Victor E. Vigil, Jr., et al. Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon

    457 U.S. 147 (1982)   Cited 5,684 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that named plaintiff must prove “much more than the validity of his own claim”; the individual plaintiff must show that “the individual's claim and the class claims will share common questions of law or fact and that the individual's claim will be typical of the class claims,” explicitly referencing the “commonality” and “typicality” requirements of Rule 23

  2. Morrison v. Booth

    763 F.2d 1366 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 100 times
    Holding that failing to seek flexibility for promotion of a black employee when flexibility was sought for white employees was suggestive of discrimination in racial discrimination case