§

Verizon North, Inc.

06-CA-035379 (N.L.R.B. Jul. 13, 2007)
Verizon North, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Bath Marine v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a motion for reconsideration was not required to exhaust where the Board had "adequate notice" of the party's position

  3. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    478 F.3d 814 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 12 times
    Recognizing in another context that ambiguous FMLA language would not overturn RLA provisions in light of long history of collective bargaining in railroad industry

  4. Intermountain Rural Elec. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    984 F.2d 1562 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding of fait accompli because employer had implemented unilateral change in policy before union received notice of change

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  6. Section 2601 - Findings and purposes

    29 U.S.C. § 2601   Cited 7,803 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Finding that there is inadequate job security for employees who have serious health conditions that prevent them from working for temporary periods

  7. Section 2612 - Leave requirement

    29 U.S.C. § 2612   Cited 5,047 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Granting qualifying employees twelve weeks of FMLA leave in a 12-month period

  8. Section 2652 - Effect on existing employment benefits

    29 U.S.C. § 2652   Cited 46 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the FMLA statute shall not be construed to diminish the obligation of employers to comply with any collective bargaining agreements or employee benefit plans that provide greater family and medical leave rights than those granted by the FMLA