Verizon Information Systems
7 Cited authorities
Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills
353 U.S. 448 (1957) Cited 2,323 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 311 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Retail Clerks v. Lion Dry Goods
369 U.S. 17 (1962) Cited 181 timesHolding that agreements other than full-fledged collective bargaining agreements may be "contracts" within the meaning of § 301
Hotel Employees, Local 2 v. Marriott Corp.
961 F.2d 1464 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 30 timesHolding that an employer could waive its right to demand a National Labor Relations Board election
Hotel Rest. Emp. Union v. J.P. Morgan Hotel
996 F.2d 561 (2d Cir. 1993) Cited 26 timesHolding that section 301 “grants courts concurrent jurisdiction [with the NLRB] over representation issues arising under a contract”
N.L.R.B. v. Paper Manufacturers Co.
786 F.2d 163 (3d Cir. 1986) Cited 10 timesNo. 85-3266. Argued January 14, 1986. Decided March 18, 1986. Thomas W. Budd, (argued), Clifton, Budd, Burke DeMaria, New York City for respondent, Paper Manufacturers Co. Bernard N. Katz (argued) Michael N. Katz, Basil L. Merenda, Meranze Katz Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent, Warehouse Employees Local 169. William T. Josem, (argued), Markowitz Richman, Philadelphia, Pa., for intervenor Graphic Communications Intern. Union Local 14, AFL-CIO. Andrew F. Tranovich, Marc B. Seidman (argued) Attys.
Snow v. N.L.R.B
308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 30 timesIn Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.