§

Veritas Health Services Inc. d/b/a Chino Valley Medical Center

363 NLRB No. 108 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Veritas Health Services Inc. d/b/a Chino Valley Medical Center

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 274 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  3. Alwin Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    192 F.3d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the striking employees' motivation for striking is central to a finding of an unfair labor practice strike

  4. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  5. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1280 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition

  7. Detroit Typographical Union No. 18 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    216 F.3d 109 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 8 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting petition for review because Board conclusion constituted legal error

  8. N.L.R.B. v. National Medical Hosp. of Compton

    907 F.2d 905 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 7 times

    No. 89-70054. Argued and Submitted November 16, 1989. Decided July 5, 1990. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing August 29, 1990. Frederick Havard, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Richard Thesing, Menlo Park, Cal., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER, NELSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: In this unusually protracted labor relations controversy, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement