Veritas Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Chino Valley Medical Center
10 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 711 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Cited 96 times 37 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B
400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005) Cited 16 timesNos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel
Evans v. Stephens
387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 15 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment
Unbelievable v. Nat. Labor Relations Bd.
118 F.3d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1997) Cited 18 times 3 Legal AnalysesApplying the American Rule to National Labor Relations Board proceedings
Waterbury Hotel Management, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
314 F.3d 645 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 10 times 1 Legal AnalysesConcluding that it was proper to infer from supervisor statements that "hiring decisions were motivated by anti-union animus"
United States v. Woodley
751 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 14 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view
United States v. Allocco
305 F.2d 704 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 25 times 3 Legal AnalysesFinding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess