§
Vemco, Inc.

2 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Vemco, Inc.

    989 F.2d 1468 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that an employer's statement that unionization would result in a work shortage resulting in reduced hours or layoffs was a permissible, objective prediction, and thus protected speech under § 8(c), where nothing suggested that the expected work shortage "was within [the employer's] control" or that the employer "would implement a cutback in hours or a layoff solely on its own initiative for reasons unrelated to the economic necessity of adjusting to a shortage of work"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Vemco, Inc.

    997 F.2d 1149 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 3 times

    No. 92-5257. Decided April 5, 1993. July 15, 1993. As Amended on Petition for Rehearing On application for enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and ROSENN, Senior Circuit Judge. The Honorable Max Rosenn, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION Now this 29th day of June, 1993, after considering the petition for rehearing and the answer thereto