§

Velox Express, Inc.

15-CA-184006 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 25, 2017)
Velox Express, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,641 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "trier of fact can reasonably infer from the falsity of the explanation that the employer is dissembling to cover up a discriminatory purpose"

  2. Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 392 (1996)   Cited 136 times
    Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Saleem v. Corporate Transp. Grp., Ltd.

    854 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2017)   Cited 120 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that advertising independently is indicative of independent contractor status when considered with other factors

  5. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  6. Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

  7. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  8. Corporate Exp. Delivery Systems v. N.L.R.B

    292 F.3d 777 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that owner-operator drivers were "employees" and not "independent contractors" under the National Labor Relations Act