§

Velocity Express, Inc.

342 N.L.R.B. 888 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Velocity Express, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Pepsi Cola Bottling, Fayettville

    258 F.3d 305 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 12 times
    Finding that lower pay by itself does not preclude full recovery

  6. Corporate Exp. Delivery Systems v. N.L.R.B

    292 F.3d 777 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that owner-operator drivers were "employees" and not "independent contractors" under the National Labor Relations Act

  7. Angle v. N.L.R.B

    683 F.2d 1296 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 7 times
    Granting the Board's order for enforcement where employer did not present necessary "sufficient credible evidence" to support assertions that Board's calculations were wrong

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Laborers' Int. Union, N. America

    748 F.2d 1001 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times
    Declining to deduct expenses for transportation, lodging and meals that the discriminatees would have incurred had they been employed during the backpay period

  9. Gasper v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    225 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times

    No. 12304. July 6, 1955. Edgar W. Pugh, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Dudley J. Godfrey, Washington, D.C., for respondent. H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Harry Baum, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a review of a decision of the Tax Court holding that a determination of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of a deficiency against the petitioner raised a presumption of correctness

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Izzi

    395 F.2d 241 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times

    No. 6459. May 14, 1968. Edward E. Wall, Washington, D.C., with whom Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, was on motion, Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Sidney A. Coven, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Chief Judge. Respondent, an individual employer, having wrongfully refused to reinstate some fifteen truck drivers, Patrick