§

Vaughn Industries

08-CA-083627 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 7, 2003)
Vaughn Industries

6 Cited authorities

  1. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 106 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  4. Midwest Stock Exchange, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 31 times
    In Midwest Stock Exch., Inc. v. NLRB, 635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980), the court found that an employer discriminatorily enforced its no-solicitation rule by strictly enforcing the rule against union activities but permitting "[s]uch drives as the Crusade of Mercy, collection of blood in a bloodmobile... [on the employer's] premises, the selling of Avon products, Tupperware, boat cruise tickets, raffle tickets, Girl Scout cookies, and a number of other items."

  5. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

  6. Williamson Piggly Wiggly v. N.L.R.B

    827 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 5 times
    In Williamson Piggly Wiggly v. NLRB, 827 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1987), this court held that a grocery store produce manager was not a supervisor even though he had the "discretion to direct the routine activities of the produce department such as unloading trucks, stocking and rotating produce, and ordering from suppliers...."