§

Vathsala Srinivasan, Complainant, v. Ida L. Castro, Chairwoman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,) Agency.

01986951 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 23, 2000)
Vathsala Srinivasan, Complainant, v. Ida L. Castro, Chairwoman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,) Agency.

10 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,419 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  2. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

    509 U.S. 502 (1993)   Cited 12,286 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

  3. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 20,004 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,165 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

  5. Prewitt v. United States Postal Service

    662 F.2d 292 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 292 times
    Concluding in a Rehabilitation Act case involving employment discrimination that the employer has the burden of persuasion on the issue of reasonable accommodation

  6. Roberts v. Morton

    549 F.2d 158 (10th Cir. 1976)   Cited 62 times
    In Roberts the court rejected appellants' argument that summary judgment and dismissal on the pleadings was erroneous, finding that the evidence supporting the decision was substantial "when viewed in light of the entire record, including the body of evidence opposed to the agency's view." Id.

  7. Norcross v. Sneed

    755 F.2d 113 (8th Cir. 1985)   Cited 39 times
    Accepting Doe's description of handicap discrimination claims

  8. Sisson v. Helms

    751 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 24 times
    Affirming dismissal of a handicap discrimination claim because "[t]he district court's finding that [the plaintiff] failed to prove that there were jobs available at the Airways Facilities Division is supported by the evidence and was not clearly erroneous"

  9. Jackson v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

    648 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 11 times
    Holding plaintiff, an hourly employee, lacked standing where pension plan at issue did not cover hourly employees

  10. Appendix to Part 1630 - Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1630 app to Part 1630   Cited 860 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity entails the nature and severity of the impairment; the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and the permanent or long term impact