§

Valmet, Inc.

15-CA-206655 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 17, 2018)
Valmet, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    835 F.3d 536 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 15–1433/1611 07-19-2016 Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., Petitioner/Cross–Respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross–Petitioner, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervening Respondent. ARGUED: Joseph J. Torres, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner/Cross–Respondent. Valerie L. Collins, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. Kristin Seifert Watson, Cloppert

  2. Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B

    73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining

  3. More Truck Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 2 times

    No. 01-1493. Argued March 10, 2003. Decided April 11, 2003. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence J. Gartner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Betty Southard Murphy and Johnine P. Barnes. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  4. Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    573 F.2d 438 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that work could be re-contracted for legitimate business reasons, with the effect that discriminatees were placed on an "employment merry-go-round"

  5. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,843 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party