§

Valley Hospital Medical Center, Inc.

28-CA-021047 (N.L.R.B. May. 23, 2007)
Valley Hospital Medical Center, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  5. Titanium Metals Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    392 F.3d 439 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 03-1345 and 03-1410. Argued October 15, 2004. Decided November 30, 2004. Rehearing En Banc Denied February 11, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. George E. Yund argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner Titanium Metals Corporation. Kira D. Vol, Attorney, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Aileen

  6. Endicott Interconnect Techn. v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.3d 532 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 8 times
    Finding that Mountain Shadows Golf "accurately reflects the holding in Jefferson Standard "

  7. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    268 F.3d 575 (8th Cir. 2001)   Cited 8 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unprotected "materially false and misleading" statement that hospital was " ‘jeopardizing the health of mothers and babies’ by depleting its staff of labor and delivery [nurses], reducing the effectiveness of the remaining [nurses] by increasing their duties, and providing less qualified replacements"